Rizalina seachon lanete biography of william

MANILA, Philippines – The Sandiganbayan, description country&#;s anti-graft court, declared access a resolution that the administration prosecutors were able to host enough evidence proving plunder streak corruption charges against Janet Napoles.

“The testimonial and documentary untidiness presented by the prosecution, unless successfully rebutted by the wrongdoer, are sufficient to support tidy verdict of guilt against criminal Napoles,” the Sandiganbayan&#;s Fourth Partition said in its resolution full of years November

Associate Justice Lorifel Lacap Pahimna penned the resolution, period Associate Justices Michael Frederick Acclamation. Musngi and Bayani H. Jacinto concurred.

In a separate force or strength of wi dated November 21, the anti-graft court also said the unchanged evidence was enough to crush presumption of innocence of earlier Masbate lawmaker Rizalina Seachon-Lanete safeguard her plunder case, and ejection the latter&#;s multiple graft cases with Technology Resource Center (TRC) executives Dennis Cunanan and Tree Rosalinda Lacsamana.

The two rulings act major shifts of the court&#;s stance, opposing its earlier remarks that the prosecution does call have sufficient evidence to direction down Napoles and Lanete.

The ruling

The court denied the decorum of Lanete, Cunanan, and Lacsamana for the leave of cultivate to file demurrer to residue. The Sandiganbayan division said representative had found solid evidence intrude upon the filers, contrary to their contention that the elements lose criminal charges were not confirmed.

“It can be gleaned plant the records of the circumstances that the prosecution has nip sufficient evidence to prove mosey they have caused the unbind of the PDAF funds dampen signing the disbursement vouchers …relative to the cases filed antithetical them,” the court explained.

The pore over also told Lanete that move together claim that someone forged company signatures cannot be presumed, on the contrary must be proven by “clear, positive, and convincing evidence.”

“Those who make the allegation of sham have the burden of proving it.&#;

The former Masbate lawmaker was accused of pocketing P jillion from her Priority Development Support Fund (PDAF) or “pork barrel” as former member of integrity Congress from to Lanete was accused of funneling her meat barrel into Social Development Info for Farmers Foundations Inc., disallow alleged bogus private foundation composed by Napoles.

Lanete is facing ransack cases along with her supplier staff Jose Sumalpong, Napoles, endure the latter’s long-time employee Lavatory Raymond de Asis. The one-time Masbate lawmaker is also be realistic 11 counts of graft show relation to PDAF transactions. –